The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia March 31 vacated a Health Resources and Services Administration policy instituted in 2013 that restricted how certain 340B hospitals could make initial drug purchases. The case challenged a provision in the rule involving group purchasing organizations, known as the “GPO prohibition,” which bars disproportionate share hospitals from simultaneously buying outpatient drugs through the 340B Drug Pricing Program and a GPO. Although the court set aside the existing GPO prohibition as unlawful, it sent the question back to the agency for reconsideration. “In that process,” the court explained, "HRSA may adopt the same bottom-line view of the statute it did in the 2013 Policy, as long as the agency adheres to the APA [Administrative Procedures Act] and does not exceed its limited rulemaking authority over the Section 340B Program.”

Headline
The AHA Sept. 23 submitted comments on the Strengthening the Exercise of Controls and Upgrading Requirements for Efficiency in 340B Act (SECURE 340B Act). The…
Headline
As policymakers continue to discuss healthcare legislation, the AHA has developed several new resources to help hospitals and other stakeholders understand the…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has released a fact sheet and FAQs on the 340B Part D claims data repository that will go live Oct. 1. Data…
Headline
The AHA Aug. 26 urged the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services not to finalize two proposals in the calendar year 2027 outpatient prospective payment…
Headline
The AHA Aug. 25 submitted comments to Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., on the 340B Drug Pricing Integrity and Affordability for Patients Act (340B for Patients Act),…
Headline
A bipartisan group of senators Aug. 5 introduced the Supporting Underserved and Strengthening Transparency, Accountability and Integrity Now and for the Future…