The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia March 31 vacated a Health Resources and Services Administration policy instituted in 2013 that restricted how certain 340B hospitals could make initial drug purchases. The case challenged a provision in the rule involving group purchasing organizations, known as the “GPO prohibition,” which bars disproportionate share hospitals from simultaneously buying outpatient drugs through the 340B Drug Pricing Program and a GPO. Although the court set aside the existing GPO prohibition as unlawful, it sent the question back to the agency for reconsideration. “In that process,” the court explained, "HRSA may adopt the same bottom-line view of the statute it did in the 2013 Policy, as long as the agency adheres to the APA [Administrative Procedures Act] and does not exceed its limited rulemaking authority over the Section 340B Program.”

Headline
The Washington Post yesterday published a letter to the editor from AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack responding to an April 18 editorial criticizing the 340B…
Headline
The Health Resources and Services Administration should abandon its consideration of a 340B rebate model pilot program because “a rebate mechanism of any kind…
Headline
The AHA and others April 17 filed an amicus brief requesting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit grant en banc review of a panel decision that…
Headline
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit April 9 affirmed rulings by a Mississippi district court that rejected requests by Novartis and PhRMA to enjoin…
Headline
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit March 31 upheld a preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of West Virginia…
Headline
 The AHA March 3 urged the Health Resources and Services Administration to take immediate action to stop a new Novo Nordisk policy from taking effect…