Report: District court denies preliminary injunction, upholding Maryland law protecting 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements
A district court in Baltimore Sept. 5 ruled against drug companies and PhRMA, denying their attempt to obtain a preliminary injunction against 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements in Maryland, according to Reuters. The AHA filed amicus briefs defending Maryland’s law against this drug industry challenge July 29 and Aug. 2, in addition to similar briefs filed in Missouri Aug. 29 and West Virginia Aug. 16.
Related News Articles
Headline
A U.S. district court judge for the District of Columbia May 15 ruled the Department of Health and Human Services must preapprove the use of 340B “rebate…
Headline
The AHA May 14 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law…
Headline
The AHA May 9 urged the Department of Health and Human Services to deny drug companies’ requests to approve their unlawful 340B rebate models. “The 340B…
Headline
The AHA May 8 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law prohibiting…
Headline
The AHA May 1 expressed concerns to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services about the payment process established under the Medicare Drug…
Headline
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D., R-La., today released a report detailing findings from an investigation…