A hospital’s penalty status in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Hospital-Acquired Conditions Reduction Program is heavily influenced by chance, according to a new study by KNG Health Consulting and AHA reported in the Journal of Healthcare Quality. Only 40.6% of the 768 hospitals penalized by the program last year had scores that were statistically different from the threshold penalty score, the study found. “In other words, the majority of hospitals receiving a HAC penalty have performance indistinguishable from those that are not being penalized,” writes Nancy Foster, AHA vice president for quality and patient safety policy, in an AHA Stat blog post. She says the study “adds to the mounting evidence that the HAC program is the wrong approach to encouraging hospitals to improve quality and safety.”

Related News Articles

Perspective
Congress returns to Washington, D.C., next week following the summer recess, and lawmakers can expect a busy fall as they face a full plate of issues that need…
Perspective
While Congress passed legislation last month to fund the federal government through September, it’s looking like there will be very few other pieces of…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Feb. 8 released a proposed rule intended to strengthen oversight of organizations that accredit health care…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights Jan. 25 released guidance reminding hospitals, critical access hospitals and long-term…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Dec. 4 released an interim final rule implementing new enforcement authorities the agency will use if states…
Headline
The Food and Drug Administration Sept. 29 released a proposed rule that would phase out over four years its general enforcement discretion approach for most…