The U.S. Supreme Court Friday agreed to hear oral arguments in cases challenging the Department of Health and Human Services for authorizing Arkansas and New Hampshire to condition Medicaid coverage on work requirements and other restrictions.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals previously affirmed district court decisions finding that the Department of Health and Human Services’ approval of these projects was arbitrary and capricious and violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA has released several resources that can be used to educate members of Congress and community stakeholders about the potential effects of harmful cuts…
Perspective
Public
The House Energy & Commerce Committee in just over a week is expected to mark up its portion of the budget reconciliation bill to enact key pieces of…
Headline
A study published April 28 by Health Affairs Scholar found low-income adults living in states with Medicaid expansion experienced an average 9.5% relative…
Headline
The AHA April 30 released a report highlighting how hospitals and health systems continue to experience significant financial headwinds that can challenge…
News
The AHA April 29 urged majority and minority leaders in both the Senate and House to not make disruptive policy changes to Medicaid and other coverage options…
Headline
Twelve House Republicans April 14 sent a letter to House leadership voicing their opposition to potential Medicaid cuts. The lawmakers said they support “…