AHA op-ed in Medical Economics sets the record straight on 340B program growth and the role of drug companies
“As pharmaceutical companies throw stone after stone at the 340B program, they should beware of their own glass house. Their complaints ring hollow when it is clear that their own actions are driving growth in the program,” says an op-ed in Medical Economics authored by Bharath Krishnamurthy, AHA director of health policy and analytics, and Megha Parikh, AHA associate director of health analytics and policy.
“…Policymakers and the public should reject the fabrications perpetuated by pharmaceutical companies,” Krishnamurthy and Parikh write. “Instead, they should work to protect and support the 340B program and the benefits it affords to countless patients and communities across the country.”
Related News Articles
Headline
The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health Feb. 11 hosted a hearing titled “Lowering Health Care Costs for All Americans: An Examination of the…
Headline
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Feb. 9 affirmed a district court ruling upholding Louisiana’s 340B contract pharmacy law. The state law prohibits…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services Feb. 5 in a court filing said it would scrap its current 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program and potentially restart…
Headline
A new AHA blog published Feb. 3 discusses how the 340B Drug Pricing Program serves as an effective solution to some of the nation’s most persistent and…
Blog
Many Americans may be unaware that the services they rely on every day through their local hospital are supported by a program called the 340B Drug Pricing…
Headline
The AHA Jan. 26 urged the Health Resources and Services Administration to take immediate action to stop a new Eli Lilly and Company policy from taking effect…