A U.S. district court judge for the District of Columbia May 15 ruled the Department of Health and Human Services must preapprove the use of 340B “rebate models” before they can be implemented, which the department has not yet done for any of the models pursued by the plaintiff drug companies. 
 
Judge Dabney Friedrich issued the ruling in a case brought by a number of drug companies, finding that when the statute says that in implementing price reductions, “any rebate or discount” taken into account shall be “as provided by the Secretary,” it means that HHS has the authority to approve or reject the proposed rebate models. “Put another way, the statute contemplates that the Secretary may ‘have as a condition’ or ‘stipulate’ how any rebate or discount is accounted for in the price ultimately paid by covered entities.” 
 
In a statement shared with the media, AHA General Counsel and Secretary Chad Golder said, “When Johnson & Johnson first proposed its rebate model, the AHA wrote to the Department of Health and Human Services asking it to prevent J&J’s brazen attempt to take the law into its own hands. Last night, the district court correctly upheld HHS’ authority to do just that. We urge the Department to stand firm by continuing to reject the drug industry’s efforts to undermine the 340B program and harm the hospitals that serve America’s rural and underserved communities. If HHS changes course now, America’s most vulnerable patients will suffer. Hospitals cannot afford to bear the administrative costs that the drug companies will inflict on them with their rebate models, nor can they afford to advance millions of dollars to these drug companies for any period of time, as the rebate models would force hospitals to do.” 
 
The AHA and other groups have filed friend-of-the-court briefs supporting HHS in 340B rebate model cases brought by Eli Lilly, Bristol Meyers Squibb and Novartis; Sanofi; Kalderos; and Johnson & Johnson
 
HHS recently announced that it will be “in a position to provide guidance” about the drug industry’s proposed use of “rebate models” by the end of May. 
 
The AHA May 9 submitted a detailed letter urging it to deny drug companies’ requests to approve their unlawful 340B rebate models. 

 

Headline
The AHA again is asking the Health Resources and Services Administration to take action after Eli Lilly warned hospitals that they could lose access to…
Headline
The Washington Post yesterday published a letter to the editor from AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack responding to an April 18 editorial criticizing the 340B…
Headline
The Health Resources and Services Administration should abandon its consideration of a 340B rebate model pilot program because “a rebate mechanism of any kind…
Headline
The AHA and others April 17 filed an amicus brief requesting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit grant en banc review of a panel decision that…
Headline
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit April 9 affirmed rulings by a Mississippi district court that rejected requests by Novartis and PhRMA to enjoin…
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia March 31 vacated a Health Resources and Services Administration policy instituted in 2013 that restricted…