Currently available public hospital quality rating systems frequently offer conflicting results, which may mislead stakeholders relying on the ratings to identify top-performing hospitals, according to an analysis published yesterday by NEJM Catalyst. The authors evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of four public hospital quality rating systems based on their experience as physician scientists with methodological expertise in health care quality measurement: the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Hospital Compare overall star ratings; Healthgrades Top Hospitals; U.S. News & World Report Best Hospitals; and Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade and Leapfrog Top Hospitals. “Each rating system had unique weaknesses that led to potential misclassification of hospital performance, ranging from inclusion of flawed measures, use of proprietary data that are not validated, and methodological decisions,” the authors said.
 

Related News Articles

Headline
AHA recently launched the Quality Collective, an exclusive peer-to-peer learning hub for health care quality leaders.  "We are thrilled to launch The…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services today updated with 2021 data the Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings at its Care Compare website and…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ new Hospital Overall Star Ratings methodology preserves some year-to-year stability, but ratings remain…
Blog
In 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) overhauled the Hospital Overall Quality Star Ratings methodology with the expressed purpose of…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services today announced it will delay updating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings on the Care Compare website…
Blog
A recent report from the Lown Institute that ranks hospitals on what they deem to be unnecessary hospital services, tests and procedures attempts to make…