A U.S. district court judge for the District of Columbia May 15 ruled the Department of Health and Human Services must preapprove the use of 340B “rebate models” before they can be implemented, which the department has not yet done for any of the models pursued by the plaintiff drug companies. 
 
Judge Dabney Friedrich issued the ruling in a case brought by a number of drug companies, finding that when the statute says that in implementing price reductions, “any rebate or discount” taken into account shall be “as provided by the Secretary,” it means that HHS has the authority to approve or reject the proposed rebate models. “Put another way, the statute contemplates that the Secretary may ‘have as a condition’ or ‘stipulate’ how any rebate or discount is accounted for in the price ultimately paid by covered entities.” 
 
In a statement shared with the media, AHA General Counsel and Secretary Chad Golder said, “When Johnson & Johnson first proposed its rebate model, the AHA wrote to the Department of Health and Human Services asking it to prevent J&J’s brazen attempt to take the law into its own hands. Last night, the district court correctly upheld HHS’ authority to do just that. We urge the Department to stand firm by continuing to reject the drug industry’s efforts to undermine the 340B program and harm the hospitals that serve America’s rural and underserved communities. If HHS changes course now, America’s most vulnerable patients will suffer. Hospitals cannot afford to bear the administrative costs that the drug companies will inflict on them with their rebate models, nor can they afford to advance millions of dollars to these drug companies for any period of time, as the rebate models would force hospitals to do.” 
 
The AHA and other groups have filed friend-of-the-court briefs supporting HHS in 340B rebate model cases brought by Eli Lilly, Bristol Meyers Squibb and Novartis; Sanofi; Kalderos; and Johnson & Johnson
 
HHS recently announced that it will be “in a position to provide guidance” about the drug industry’s proposed use of “rebate models” by the end of May. 
 
The AHA May 9 submitted a detailed letter urging it to deny drug companies’ requests to approve their unlawful 340B rebate models. 

 

Related News Articles

Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services Feb. 5 in a court filing said it would scrap its current 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program and potentially restart…
Headline
A new AHA blog published Feb. 3 discusses how the 340B Drug Pricing Program serves as an effective solution to some of the nation’s most persistent and…
Blog
Public
Many Americans may be unaware that the services they rely on every day through their local hospital are supported by a program called the 340B Drug Pricing…
Headline
The AHA Jan. 26 urged the Health Resources and Services Administration to take immediate action to stop a new Eli Lilly and Company policy from taking effect…
Headline
The federal government has dropped its appeal of a preliminary injunction blocking implementation of the Department of Health and Human Services’ 340B Rebate…
Headline
The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Jan. 7 denied the government’s motion for a stay in a lawsuit filed by the AHA, the Maine Hospital Association and four…