340B Drug Pricing Program at a Glance
For more than 30 years, the 340B Drug Pricing Program has provided financial help to hospitals serving vulnerable communities to manage rising prescription drug costs.
Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act requires pharmaceutical manufacturers participating in Medicaid to sell outpatient drugs at discounted prices to health care organizations that care for many uninsured and low-income patients. These organizations include federal grantee organizations and several types of hospitals, including critical access hospitals (CAHs), sole community hospitals (SCHs), rural referral centers (RRCs), and public and nonprofit disproportionate share hospitals (DSH) that serve low-income and indigent populations.
The program allows 340B hospitals to stretch limited federal resources to reduce the price of outpatient pharmaceuticals for patients and expand health services to the patients and communities they serve. Hospitals use 340B savings to provide, for example, free care for uninsured patients, offer free vaccines, provide services in mental health clinics, and implement medication management and community health programs.
According to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), which is responsible for administering the 340B program, enrolled hospitals and other covered entities can achieve average savings of 25% to 50% in pharmaceutical purchases. Despite significant oversight from HRSA and the program’s proven record of decreasing government spending and expanding access to patient care, some want to scale it back or drastically reduce the benefits that eligible hospitals and their patients receive from the program.
AHA’s Position on the 340B Drug Pricing Program
- Protect the 340B program for all providers and ensure the program continues to help providers stretch limited resources and provide more comprehensive services to more patients.
- Advocate that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) remedy all affected hospitals for the unlawful Medicare payment cuts and expand drug manufacturer transparency.
- Thwart drug manufacturers’ efforts to unilaterally and unlawfully change the 340B program.
- Support eliminating the orphan drug exclusion for certain 340B hospitals.
- Oppose efforts to scale back, significantly reduce the benefits of, or expand the regulatory burden of the 340B program, including proposals to dramatically expand reporting requirements on certain 340B hospitals and impose a moratorium on new entrants into the program.
- Support expanding the program to reach additional vulnerable communities, including investor-owned hospitals that provide care for underserved populations.
- Support program integrity efforts that are equitable and accountable for both providers and drug companies to ensure adherence to the program’s rules and regulations.
- PhRMA-led Coalition Seeks to Dismantle 340B at Patients’ Expense
- Restoring the 340B OPPS Payment Policy: Good for Patients, Good for Providers
- Key Insights from Supreme Court Oral Arguments in AHA’s 340B Case
- Live Analysis: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in AHA’s 340B Case
- New Report on 340B Misses the Mark
- PhRMA Report Misleads on Drug Costs
- Report Misrepresents 340B Program to Deflect from Sky High Drug Prices
- Grady Health System (Atlanta, Ga.)
- Providence Portland Medical Center (Portland, Ore.)
- Providence St. Vincent Medical Center (Portland, Ore.)
- Central Vermont Medical Center (Berlin, Vt.)
- Adirondack Health (Saranac Lake, N.Y.)
- Southwestern Vermont Medical Center (Bennington, Vt.)
- Renown Regional Medical Center (Reno, Nev.)
- Baxter Health (Mountain Home, Ark.)
- Golden Valley Memorial Healthcare (Clinton, Mo.)
- Valleywise Health (Phoenix, Ariz.)
- WVU Medicine St. Joseph’s Hospital (Buckhannon, W.Va)