A federal district court judge in Alabama yesterday ruled that the Blue Cross Blue Shield organizations named in multi-district antitrust litigation in that court must defend under a strict per se standard of review the geographic and output restrictions in the “exclusive service area” and “national best efforts” rules limiting where and how their plans compete for business. For per se antitrust violations, no defense or justification is allowed. The judge also ruled that there are “genuine issues of material facts” as to whether the BCBS organizations operate as a single entity when they enforce their Blue Mark restrictions, a finding that would strip them of immunity for these restrictions and subject them to the same strict scrutiny competitors face for potentially anticompetitive agreements. For details, see the judge’s April 5 opinion and order.

Related News Articles

Perspective
Congress returns to Washington, D.C., next week following the summer recess, and lawmakers can expect a busy fall as they face a full plate of issues that need…
Perspective
While Congress passed legislation last month to fund the federal government through September, it’s looking like there will be very few other pieces of…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Feb. 8 released a proposed rule intended to strengthen oversight of organizations that accredit health care…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights Jan. 25 released guidance reminding hospitals, critical access hospitals and long-term…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Dec. 4 released an interim final rule implementing new enforcement authorities the agency will use if states…
Headline
The Food and Drug Administration Sept. 29 released a proposed rule that would phase out over four years its general enforcement discretion approach for most…