A federal district court judge in Alabama yesterday ruled that the Blue Cross Blue Shield organizations named in multi-district antitrust litigation in that court must defend under a strict per se standard of review the geographic and output restrictions in the “exclusive service area” and “national best efforts” rules limiting where and how their plans compete for business. For per se antitrust violations, no defense or justification is allowed. The judge also ruled that there are “genuine issues of material facts” as to whether the BCBS organizations operate as a single entity when they enforce their Blue Mark restrictions, a finding that would strip them of immunity for these restrictions and subject them to the same strict scrutiny competitors face for potentially anticompetitive agreements. For details, see the judge’s April 5 opinion and order.

Related News Articles

Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services has agreed to delay implementing its final rule concerning certain statutory conscience rights in health care, San…
Headline
The AHA today submitted comments on the Centers for Medicare…
Headline
The AHA today commended the Centers for Medicare…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services aims to release proposed rules amending the physician self-referral (Stark law) regulations and safe-harbors under…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights today published in the Federal Register its final rule concerning federal health care-…
Headline
The Federal Trade Commission will hold a public workshop June 18 in Washington, D.C., to assess the impact of certificates of public advantage on health care…