The Palo Alto Accountable and Affordable Care Initiative, challenged by certain hospitals and the California Hospital Association in Stanford Health Care v. City of Palo Alto, would impose an “acceptable payment amount” on the compensation hospitals and other medical providers can receive from insurers and certain other payers for the care provided to patients. “[T]he fact that no municipality has ever imposed price controls on hospitals should, at the very least, raise red flags ... about whether Palo Alto has the legal authority to do so,” states the AHA brief, filed in California superior court in Santa Clara County. “In addition, history reveals that Congress expressly invited … earlier State rate-setting experiments. Such an invitation is not only lacking today, but the Affordable Care Act provides a powerful signal that Congress sought to bring down the costs of hospital services using measures other than rate caps.”

Headline
The 2027 AHA Rural Healthcare Leadership Conference will be held Jan. 31-Feb. 3 in Orlando, Fla. Join fellow rural hospital CEOs, senior executives, clinical…
Headline
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Aug. 11 ruled to vacate certain regulations implementing how the No Surprises Act qualifying payment amount is calculated…
Headline
Update: The Senate passed the continuing resolution Aug. 8 by a vote of 90-6 and one present vote. The Senate is expected to vote this week on its own…
Headline
The AHA’s American Society for Health Care Engineering announced July 27 that Geisinger is the winner of its 2026 Excellence in Health Care Facility Management…
Headline
The AHA July 27 expressed support for the National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025 (S. 1482), legislation that would establish state-based nursing…
Headline
The House July 21 passed a continuing resolution that would fund the government through Dec. 4 by a 220-205 vote. The CR does not include extensions of key…