Hospitals participating in the first year of Medicare’s Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model reduced payments for lower extremity joint replacement episodes by an average 3.3 percent more than hospitals that did not participate in the model, largely by shifting patients to less intensive post-acute care settings, according to an analysis prepared for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services by the Lewin Group. For example, the share of CJR patients discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility fell by a relative 2.2 percentage points while the share discharged to a home health agency rose by 3.9 percentage points. The study found no changes in quality of care as measured by readmission rates, emergency department visits and mortality. CMS implemented the five-year payment model, which qualifies as an advanced alternative payment model under the Quality Payment Program for clinicians, in certain geographic areas in April 2016. The first-year report does not include estimates of the change in Medicare program savings, which were not yet available. 
 

Related News Articles

Headline
The U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island Sept. 30 denied motions from AbbVie and Novartis seeking a preliminary injunction against the state’s…
Headline
The anticipated burdens on hospitals to comply with the Health Resources and Services Administration’s 340B Rebate Pilot Program far exceed the agency’s…
Headline
Ashley Thompson, AHA senior vice president of public policy analysis and development, participated in a panel discussion during Modern Healthcare's Leadership…
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the District of Maine today issued an order denying preliminary injunctions requested by AbbVie and Novartis in legal challenges…
Headline
The AHA commented Sept. 15 on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services calendar year 2026 outpatient prospective payment system and ambulatory surgical…
Headline
The AHA Sept. 15 urged Aetna to rescind its recently announced “level of severity inpatient payment” policy, saying that it “could erode the transparency…