The U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently urged the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to withdraw its proposed rule on Medicaid program financing and supplemental payments. The Chamber said the rule would “have detrimental economic ramifications on communities across the country; put patient access to critical services in jeopardy, exacerbate cost-shifting onto privately insured communities; and violate state sovereignty and ability to manage state programs and populations by providing CMS unprecedented discretion over its evaluation of state financing and payment approaches.”

Among other comments on the rule, the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission urged the agency “not to implement new limits for supplemental payments and financing arrangements at this time because CMS has not fully assessed the effects of these changes. In particular, the Commission is concerned that the proposed changes could reduce payments to providers in ways that could jeopardize access to care for Medicaid enrollees. … A careful review of the access implications of new federal policies is especially important given CMS’s previous proposal to rescind the requirement that states evaluate access before reducing or restructuring provider payments.”

The National Association of Medicaid Directors said the rule “would impose uniform rules and requirements on states without sufficient consideration to the diversity of state program designs and financing mechanisms. This one-size-fits-all approach will inevitably create challenges for the majority of states. While we support clarifying the parameters of appropriate financing mechanisms, CMS should not do so in a manner that gives the federal government significantly more authority over state decisions or define parameters so tightly that states no longer have necessary flexibility to administer their programs.” 

As previously reported, the National Governors Association also urged CMS not to move forward with the proposed rule as written.

AHA has urged CMS to withdraw the rule because it would “severely curtail the availability of health care services to millions of individuals” and “many of its provisions are not legally permissible.” In a recent joint statement, AHA and the American Health Care Association detailed additional negative consequences if the rule were to go into effect. 
 

Headline
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services April 8 issued guidance on implementing a provision within the reconciliation bill passed in July 2025 regarding…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services April 2 announced the release of new data on health care utilization and prices at the provider and service…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center March 24 announced the launch of a new model under Medicaid and the Children’s Health…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services March 11 issued guidance to state survey agency directors clarifying and reinforcing the roles and…
Headline
The Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission March 12 released its March 2026 report to Congress. The first chapter includes a recommendation to…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services March 6 issued guidance to states on transitioning to six-month Medicaid redeterminations in 2027, a change…