The Department of Health and Human Services this week in a strongly worded letter to Eli Lilly calls into question recent actions by the drug manufacturer to limit 340B hospital and community clinics’ use of 340B contract pharmacy arrangements. The HHS letter is in response to the drug manufacturer’s request for a pre-advisory enforcement action. 

The letter notes that the Health Resources and Services Administration has already directly expressed significant concerns regarding the drug manufacturer’s new policy and is continuing its review.

The HHS letter states that “Lilly cannot and should not view the absence of any questions from the government as somehow endorsing Lilly’s policy especially when this Department is leading government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” 

In addition, HHS warns Eli Lilly that potential litigation is possible if the drug manufacturer “knowingly violates a material condition of the program that results in over-charges to grantees and contractors.”  

Headline
The Washington Post yesterday published a letter to the editor from AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack responding to an April 18 editorial criticizing the 340B…
Headline
The Health Resources and Services Administration should abandon its consideration of a 340B rebate model pilot program because “a rebate mechanism of any kind…
Headline
The AHA and others April 17 filed an amicus brief requesting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit grant en banc review of a panel decision that…
Headline
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit April 9 affirmed rulings by a Mississippi district court that rejected requests by Novartis and PhRMA to enjoin…
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia March 31 vacated a Health Resources and Services Administration policy instituted in 2013 that restricted…
Headline
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit March 31 upheld a preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of West Virginia…