The Department of Health and Human Services this week in a strongly worded letter to Eli Lilly calls into question recent actions by the drug manufacturer to limit 340B hospital and community clinics’ use of 340B contract pharmacy arrangements. The HHS letter is in response to the drug manufacturer’s request for a pre-advisory enforcement action. 

The letter notes that the Health Resources and Services Administration has already directly expressed significant concerns regarding the drug manufacturer’s new policy and is continuing its review.

The HHS letter states that “Lilly cannot and should not view the absence of any questions from the government as somehow endorsing Lilly’s policy especially when this Department is leading government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” 

In addition, HHS warns Eli Lilly that potential litigation is possible if the drug manufacturer “knowingly violates a material condition of the program that results in over-charges to grantees and contractors.”  

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA Nov. 15 filed friend-of-the-court briefs in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in support of an earlier denial by the U.S. District Court…
Headline
Johnson & Johnson Nov. 12 filed a lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services and the Health Resources and Services Administration asking a…
Headline
The AHA Nov. 7 filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas in defense of the state's law protecting against…
Headline
The AHA, 340B Health, the Minnesota Hospital Association and American Society of Health-system Pharmacists Oct. 4 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District…
Headline
A Louisiana district court Sept. 30 upheld a state law prohibiting drug companies from denying Louisiana hospitals 340B discounts for drugs dispensed at…
Headline
Johnson & Johnson Sept. 30 notified the Health Resources and Services Administration that it is ceasing implementation of its proposed 340B rebate model.…