The AHA and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Nov. 14 urged House and Senate leaders to oppose any policies that fail to take into account the costs of safely providing drug administration services to the complex patients that hospitals serve.  
  
“Proposals to reduce reimbursements for drug administration services in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) inappropriately equate care provided in these hospital clinics with less complex care provided at freestanding physician offices,” they wrote. “The care is not equivalent, and current payment rates take into account these important differences. … We are concerned that these proposed policies will force hospitals and pharmacists to scale back some of the critical services they are able to provide to their patients. Given that Medicare beneficiaries who seek care in HOPDs are more likely to be sicker and more medically complex than those treated at independent physicians’ offices, this may result in reduced access to care for some of our most medically vulnerable patients.” 
 

Related News Articles

Headline
In comments Nov. 12 to majority and minority leaders of the House and Senate, the AHA requested that Congress act on key priorities for hospitals and health…
Headline
Senators Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Nov. 1 released a policy framework detailing a plan to impose site-neutral payments on hospitals. Site…
Headline
The AHA Aug. 13 commented to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission in anticipation of the commission’s 2024-2025 cycle. The AHA urged MedPAC to carefully…
Headline
In response to a recent Washington Post op-ed favoring site-neutral payment, AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack writes in a letter to the editor published…
Perspective
It’s an understatement to say everything on the national political scene is both unprecedented and unpredictable these days.To state the obvious, there will be…
Headline
Site-neutral policies fail to recognize that not all sites of care are created equal, writes AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack in a letter to the editor…