Report: District court denies preliminary injunction, upholding Maryland law protecting 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements
A district court in Baltimore Sept. 5 ruled against drug companies and PhRMA, denying their attempt to obtain a preliminary injunction against 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements in Maryland, according to Reuters. The AHA filed amicus briefs defending Maryland’s law against this drug industry challenge July 29 and Aug. 2, in addition to similar briefs filed in Missouri Aug. 29 and West Virginia Aug. 16.
Related News Articles
Headline
The AHA March 3 urged the Health Resources and Services Administration to take immediate action to stop a new Novo Nordisk policy from taking effect…
Headline
The Health Resources and Services Administration Feb. 25 said it will extend the deadline to April 20 to receive comments on its request for information on…
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii Feb. 23 denied a preliminary injunction requested by AstraZeneca in a case challenging the state’s law…
Headline
The AHA, joined by several other national groups representing 340B hospitals, Feb. 19 urged the Health Resources and Services Administration to extend the…
Headline
The Minnesota Court of Appeals Feb. 17 affirmed a lower court decision in ruling that the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law is not preempted by federal law.…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services Feb. 13 issued a request for information on a new 340B rebate model program. The RFI said HHS’ Health Resources and…