The Health Resources and Services Administration Sept. 17 told Johnson & Johnson that the company’s publicly announced plans to implement a 340B rebate model “violates J&J’s obligations under the 340B statute, and HRSA expects J&J to cease implementation of it.”  

“Because J&J’s rebate proposal, if implemented, violates J&J’s obligations under the 340B statute, it subjects J&J to potential consequences, such as termination of J&J’s Pharmaceutical Pricing Agreement (PPA),” HRSA wrote Sept. 17. In addition, HRSA told J&J that the 340B statute provides for “[t]he imposition of sanctions in the form of civil monetary penalties” on “any manufacturer with an agreement under this section that knowingly and intentionally charges a covered entity a price for purchase of a drug that exceeds the maximum applicable price under subsection (a)(1).”

Specifically, HRSA asked J&J to cease implementation immediately and inform the agency no later than Sept. 30, in order to provide adequate notice to covered entities. On Aug. 23, J&J announced that it would be upending its approach to 340B pricing for two of its most popular products, Stelara and Xarelto. Historically, J&J offered upfront discounts to 340B hospitals when they purchased these drugs. Starting on Oct. 15, however, J&J said it requires all disproportionate share hospitals participating in the 340B Program to purchase these drugs at full price and apply for a rebate from J&J. Under the new program, these hospitals would be required to submit certain data to J&J when they purchase the drugs at full price. After J&J verifies the drug’s 340B status, it will send disproportionate share hospitals a rebate for the difference between the amount paid and the discounted 340B price.

Right after J&J’s announcement, AHA expressed concern and said HRSA should take “immediate enforcement action,” including assessing civil monetary penalties on J&J for intentionally overcharging 340B hospitals.

Related News Articles

Chairperson's File
Public
Advocacy is a core part of the work of the AHA, protecting and sustaining what hospitals and health systems need to truly care for our communities. We often…
Headline
A U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge June 27 ruled against Johnson & Johnson and sided with the Department of Health and Human Services…
Headline
The AHA June 16 released a report showing hospitals that participated in the 340B Drug Pricing Program are not only subject to disproportionately greater…
Chairperson's File
Public
Advocacy is such an important part of what we do as hospitals and health systems — and what the AHA does on behalf of our field — to help ensure that we get…
Headline
The AHA June 4 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law…
Headline
A U.S. district court judge for the District of Columbia May 15 ruled the Department of Health and Human Services must preapprove the use of 340B “rebate…