AHA on July 21 submitted comments on how Congress can ensure that the 340B program continues to benefit patients and communities, while acting to prevent any cuts to the program that would jeopardize patient access to care. Responding to a bipartisan request by senators for input, AHA strongly urged that the Health Resources and Services Administration finalize its Administrative Dispute Resolution rule for the 340B program and explicitly state that the ADR process is an available forum for affected 340B hospitals to seek redress from restrictions targeted to community and specialty pharmacies. AHA also recommended that Congress require HRSA to increase its annual audits of drug companies in the 340B program, which average six per year compared with over 200 per year for 340B covered entities, and give hospitals and other covered entities the ability to audit drug manufacturers.

Related News Articles

Headline
A U.S. district court judge for the District of Columbia May 15 ruled the Department of Health and Human Services must preapprove the use of 340B “rebate…
Headline
The AHA May 14 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law…
Headline
The AHA May 9 urged the Department of Health and Human Services to deny drug companies’ requests to approve their unlawful 340B rebate models. “The 340B…
Headline
The AHA May 8 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law prohibiting…
Headline
The AHA May 1 expressed concerns to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services about the payment process established under the Medicare Drug…
Headline
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D., R-La., today released a report detailing findings from an investigation…