AHA on July 21 submitted comments on how Congress can ensure that the 340B program continues to benefit patients and communities, while acting to prevent any cuts to the program that would jeopardize patient access to care. Responding to a bipartisan request by senators for input, AHA strongly urged that the Health Resources and Services Administration finalize its Administrative Dispute Resolution rule for the 340B program and explicitly state that the ADR process is an available forum for affected 340B hospitals to seek redress from restrictions targeted to community and specialty pharmacies. AHA also recommended that Congress require HRSA to increase its annual audits of drug companies in the 340B program, which average six per year compared with over 200 per year for 340B covered entities, and give hospitals and other covered entities the ability to audit drug manufacturers.

Related News Articles

Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services Feb. 5 in a court filing said it would scrap its current 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program and potentially restart…
Headline
A new AHA blog published Feb. 3 discusses how the 340B Drug Pricing Program serves as an effective solution to some of the nation’s most persistent and…
Blog
Public
Many Americans may be unaware that the services they rely on every day through their local hospital are supported by a program called the 340B Drug Pricing…
Headline
The AHA Jan. 26 urged the Health Resources and Services Administration to take immediate action to stop a new Eli Lilly and Company policy from taking effect…
Headline
The federal government has dropped its appeal of a preliminary injunction blocking implementation of the Department of Health and Human Services’ 340B Rebate…
Headline
The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Jan. 7 denied the government’s motion for a stay in a lawsuit filed by the AHA, the Maine Hospital Association and four…