Legal Documents

American Hospital Association legal documents.

American Hospital Association (AHA) v. Rainer concerns a new rule from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) that severely restricts hospitals’ ability to rely on common third-party technologies that they use to analyze their websites and communicate…
The American Hospital Association (AHA), joined by the Texas Hospital Association, Texas Health Resources, and United Regional Health Care System, today sued the federal government to bar enforcement of an unlawful, harmful, and counterproductive rule that has upended hospitals’ and health systems’…
This Privacy Policy describes the practices of the American Hospital Association, its subsidiaries and affiliates (referred to as a group as "AHA") regarding past and ongoing collection and use of information from visitors to our websites and users of our other Internet services (hereinafter a “Web…
Plaintiffs the American Hospital Association (“AHA”), Baxter Regional Medical Center, Covenant Health, and Rutland Regional Medical Center (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this mandamus complaint to compel the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to meet the statutory deadlines for…
ALJ Delay April 2023 Status Report Filed April 7, 2023 regarding AHA, Hospitals Sue to Require HHS to Meet Deadlines for Deciding Appeals.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut yesterday largely dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Yale New Haven Hospital violated its fiduciary duties by selecting a retirement plan with excessive fees or poorly performing investments.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut yesterday largely dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Yale New Haven Hospital violated its fiduciary duties by selecting a retirement plan with excessive fees or poorly performing investments. The court allowed certain ancillary claims related…
Drugmakers that participate in the 340B drug pricing program do not have to provide discounted 340B drugs to an unlimited number of contract pharmacies, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled in Sanofi-Aventis U.S. v. HHS et al.
Memorandum Opinion: Granting in Part, Denying In Part Plaintiffs Motion to Hold Unlawful and Remedy Defendants’ Past Underpayments of 340b Drugs
Pending are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption (Doc. No. 24), Defendant Leslie Rutledge’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32), and Intervenors’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Preemption (Doc. No. 35). The parties have responded and replied.1 For the reasons set…