There is a little-known – but critical – law that helps ensure hospitals are able to care for their communities.  It is a ban on physician self-referral to hospitals in which they have an ownership interest. A permanent ban was put into effect in 2010 and eliminating it would raise the federal deficit by $500 million. The ban has long had bipartisan Congressional support and the initial moratorium on the practice of self-referral passed in 2003 under a Republican Congress and was signed into law by a Republican president. 

A recent column touting the benefits of physician owned hospitals failed to say that eliminating the ban would result in gaming of the Medicare program. In addition, it could jeopardize patient access to emergency care, potentially harm sicker and lower-income patients, and damage the safety-net provided by full-service hospitals.

These arrangements have been studied for more than 15 years by Congress, several administrations and independent organizations such as The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. The data is clear.  Several studies show that physician self-referral leads to higher per capita utilization of health care services, which can be costly to patients. This is the epitome of health care inefficiency and rising costs.

 

The reality is physician-owned hospitals typically provide only the most profitable services, such as cardiac, orthopedic or general surgery.  By steering their most profitable cases to facilities they own, physician-owners drain essential resources from full-service community hospitals, which depend on a balance of services and patients to provide expensive, life-saving services such as trauma centers, burn units and mental health services – vital services generally not provided by physician-owned hospitals. 

In fact, almost half of physician-owned hospitals not only lack emergency rooms, but those that claim to often limit the scope of their treatment to minor ailments, and those that do not  are often ill-equipped to respond to medical emergencies that happen in their own hospitals. 

Community hospitals strive to improve what they do every day as technology and medical techniques advance – all with the goal of providing a healing environment for all those in need.  Full-service hospitals take their mission of caring for communities very seriously and will continue to provide the best care possible to their entire community. This proposal would do harm to that mission, and is ill advised.

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA has released several resources that can be used to educate members of Congress and community stakeholders about the potential effects of harmful cuts…
Perspective
Public
The House Energy & Commerce Committee in just over a week is expected to mark up its portion of the budget reconciliation bill to enact key pieces of…
Headline
A study published April 28 by Health Affairs Scholar found low-income adults living in states with Medicaid expansion experienced an average 9.5% relative…
Headline
The AHA April 30 released a report highlighting how hospitals and health systems continue to experience significant financial headwinds that can challenge…
News
The AHA April 29 urged majority and minority leaders in both the Senate and House to not make disruptive policy changes to Medicaid and other coverage options…
Perspective
Public
One year ago, a nurse at Children’s Hospital Colorado went above and beyond in a way that a very young patient and her family will never forget. Kayla…