A bipartisan group of House members Nov. 28 introduced AHA-supported legislation that would prohibit health insurers from charging fees for standard electronic fund transfers to pay health care providers for services. Commercial insurers often automatically charge health care providers a percentage-based fee for EFT payments. 

“These fees effectively reduce contracted rates and cost hospitals and health care systems substantial amounts of money that could otherwise be invested into patient care,” AHA said in a letter of support for the bill, introduced by Reps. Greg Murphy, R-N.C., Derek Kilmer, D-Wash., Morgan Griffith, R-Va., Ami Bera, D-Calif., Mariannette Miller-Meeks, R-Iowa, and Kim Schrier, D-Wash. “EFT fees, which are essentially forcing hospitals to pay money to get paid, are especially egregious given all of the other financially-motivated tactics that commercial health insurers routinely use to delay or deny care for patients.”

Related News Articles

Headline
The White House June 6 issued a memorandum directing the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services “to take appropriate action to eliminate…
Headline
The AHA June 4 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law…
Headline
Adrienne Coopey, D.O., a child and adolescent psychiatrist at the West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, discusses how a fully virtual…
Headline
A U.S. district court judge for the District of Columbia May 15 ruled the Department of Health and Human Services must preapprove the use of 340B “rebate…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services May 12 released draft guidance for the third round of negotiations for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation…
Headline
The AHA May 14 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law…