A new paper by two respected economists “throws cold water” on an untested theory that claims competition falls and prices rise when hospitals in distant geographies combine, writes Melinda Reid Hatton, AHA general counsel and senior vice president, in an AHASTAT blog post. Among its flaw, the theory defines geographic markets too restrictively; fails to account for quality improvements, capital investments and the value of system membership; discounts the ability of health plans to replace the hospitals in their networks; and uses highly aggregated data that obscures any price difference among payers, the economists note.

Related News Articles

Perspective
Seventy years ago, George Brock Chisholm, M.D., the first director-general of the World Health Organization, famously stated that “without mental health there…
Headline
The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission Dec. 18 jointly issued the 2023 merger guidelines describing how the agencies review mergers and…
Headline
The U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Louisiana Sept. 27 ruled in favor of a LCMC Health and Tulane University partnership, concluding that the…
Headline
The AHA today urged the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice not to finalize the draft guidelines describing how the agencies review mergers and…
Headline
AHA urged the Federal Trade Commission to withdraw its proposed changes to the premerger notification rules, form and instructions under the Hart-Scott-Rodino…
Headline
The AHA Aug. 1 joined the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other organizations in urging the Federal Trade Commission to extend for at least 60 days the comment…