The Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, or HAC program, by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS), is broken. In yesterday’s American Journal of Medical Quality, the AHA and our research partners at KNG Health Consulting, Network for Excellence in Health Innovation and the Association of American Medical Colleges published an article outlining the inherent bias in the formula used to calculate the HAC penalties for hospitals and health systems.

The way the law and CMS’s regulations set up the HAC program unfairly penalizes hospitals at both ends of the spectrum – both the larger and smaller ones – and over the past two years in which HAC penalties have been finalized and the estimated amount for 2017, they are expected to total more than $1 billion. As stated in the article, “Large hospitals, compared with smaller hospitals, are more likely to be identified as poor performers for measures with very low probabilities of complication. The reverse holds for measures with higher probabilities of complication.” In other words, penalties on the HAC program are more a function of math than of true underlying quality.

As shown by our study, the HAC program penalties disproportionately impact the nation’s teaching and large urban hospitals. But that is just one of the issues with the HAC program.

Our research, as well as the research of others, identified surveillance bias and inadequate risk adjustment as two issues that could bias the measures used in the HAC program, especially the claims-based Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) measure. 

Even CMS’s own analyses show some of the measures do not truly capture hospital performance, especially for hospitals that care for patients with complex health needs. According to a 2012 analysis commissioned by CMS, many of the individual components of the composite PSI 90 measure fail to reliably capture hospital performance. Because of inadequate risk adjustment in the PSI 90 measure, hospitals may score worse simply because of their complex patient mix. That fails to accurately portray hospital performance.

America’s hospitals are deeply committed to keeping patients safe. We support programs that effectively promote patient safety improvements. Unfortunately, the HAC program misses the mark. The current law needs to be reformed to more effectively promote improvement. And better measures are needed that accurately reflect performance on important issues.

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA Quest for Quality Prize honors hospitals and health systems committed to leadership and innovation in improving quality and advancing health. Learn how…
Headline
A JAMA study published Aug. 20 found that nearly 63% of all U.S. drug production facilities from 2019 through 2024 were in counties where a weather disaster…
Blog
Read about the 2025 Quest for Quality Prize winner and finalist — and apply for the 2026 awardEach day, health care professionals across the U.S. leverage…
Perspective
Public
Hospitals and health systems across the country vary in size, as well as the types of services and specialties they offer. They also offer many different…
Headline
The AHA Aug. 7 launched a new webpage, Reducing Disparities in Health Outcomes, featuring new and familiar resources for members and their communities. As part…
Headline
Nell Buhlman, chief administrative officer and head of strategy at Press Ganey, and Chris DeRienzo, M.D., AHA chief physician executive, explore the data-…