A recent study published in JAMA Health Forum that examines CARES Act Provider Relief Funds allocated to health care providers misses the point of those payments and makes arbitrary choices about which payments to include, writes Ashley Thompson, AHA senior vice president for public policy analysis and development, in a new AHA blog post. “In fact, it should not come as a surprise that larger hospitals and health systems serving more COVID-19 patients received more relief. While we welcome transparency of the PRF and exploration of the realities faced by hospitals during the pandemic, this study falls short.” Thompson says the study’s authors question the approach of high impact payments going “disproportionately to those that eventually had the most cases,” ignoring that this was the stated intent of these payments by the federal government. Read the full blog for more on why the study misses the mark.

Headline
The California Hospital Association announced Sept. 18 that Bryan Bucklew, president and CEO of Hospital Council – Northern & Central California (a…
Perspective
Public
This weekly column has always been an opportunity to reflect on the issues shaping our field and to contribute to the conversations that move our mission…
Headline
The Association of American Medical Colleges announced Sept. 15 that David J. Skorton, M.D., president and CEO, will retire from his role June 30, 2027.…
Blog
Public
Hospital and health system leaders are navigating workforce shortages, reimbursement pressures, caring for a sicker patient population and rising operational…
Headline
The Department of Health of Human Services Aug. 21 issued a request for information seeking feedback on immunization categories within the Aug. 10 executive…
Headline
The Ohio Hospital Association announced Aug. 19 that Sean McGlone, OHA senior vice president and general counsel, will be its next president and CEO effective…