The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services today issued a proposed rule setting forth a bundled payment model for radiation oncology, which would be mandatory in certain areas of the country. Under the model, participants would receive a bundled payment for 90-day episodes of radiation therapy for 17 disease sites, including breast, lung, prostate, kidney and colorectal cancer. This bundled payment would be made instead of regular Medicare fee-for-service payments; providers would keep any savings if spending is less than the bundled payment, subject to quality and patient experience measures, but also would be responsible for any spending above the payment amount. In addition, the model is designed to be site-neutral — that is, the bundled payment amount is designed to be calculated similarly regardless of whether the provider is a physician, hospital outpatient department or non-hospital setting. CMS proposes to run the model for five years, beginning either Jan. 1 or April 1, 2020. The proposed rule is expected to be published in the Federal Register soon, and CMS will accept comment for 60 days after publication. 

Headline
A blog by Robyn Tessin, AHA director of policy, discusses the ways value-based care can meet patients’ needs, resulting in improved affordability and access to…
Blog
For patients, healthcare affordability is about more than the price of an individual service. It is also about whether the healthcare system meets their needs…
Headline
A bipartisan group of senators Aug. 5 introduced the Supporting Underserved and Strengthening Transparency, Accountability and Integrity Now and for the Future…
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services today issued a notice announcing a revised 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, allowing qualifying drug manufacturers…
Headline
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services July 22 released implementation guidance following a district court ruling July 16 that…
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia July 21 upheld a lower court’s decision that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not …