Action Alert: Urge House Leadership to Withdraw Provision in Coronavirus Funding Package

The House of Representatives today is expected to vote on a supplemental funding package, H.R. 6201, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, released last night by House Democratic leaders related to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19).

While the AHA appreciates Congress’ efforts to fund many important areas related to the COVID-19 outbreak, we are concerned about a provision currently in the bill that requires the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) by one month after the bill’s enactment to establish a COVID-19 emergency temporary standard (and subsequently a permanent standard) that would require health care sector employers (and any other sectors whom the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and OSHA identifies as having elevated risk) to develop and implement a comprehensive infectious disease exposure control plan with the level of infection control precautions set to at least the level of SARS from 2007 and provide no less protection than precautions mandated by state OSHA plans. More details on the provision are below.

Please contact your representative and urge House leadership to withdraw this provision from the spending package. This provision would be impossible to implement in hospitals due to the severe lack of availability of N-95 respirators. If this provision were to be enacted, hospital inpatient capacity would be dramatically reduced.

MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROVISION

This provision is tied to the SARS virus, which has been scientifically proven to be transmitted through the air (“airborne”), in addition to spread through droplets and on surfaces. Protecting health care workers from SARS required N-95 respirators for routine care.

In contrast, COVID-19 by all current evidence is droplet and contact spread, and thus does not require N-95 respirators during routine interactions between health care providers and patients. Currently, the CDC allows for regular masks if there is low supply of N-95 respirators for routine care. CDC does require N-95 for certain procedures (aerosolizing procedures). For several weeks, the World Health Organization’s guidance has been regular masks for routine care (not N-95 respirators).

In addition, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services requires hospitals to be in compliance with CDC standards. CDC closely follows scientific evidence and updates its standards as more becomes known about emerging pathogens. As the world’s leading and most trusted organization on disease prevention, CDC should continue its critical role in developing standards, and there should not be conflicting, duplicate or unnecessary regulatory burden placed on hospitals.

Related Resources

Special Bulletin
Public
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today announced that it will distribute $1.4 billion in funds from the Public Health and Social Services…
Case Studies
Public
The recent surge of COVID-19 cases in Central Florida affects the residents in seven Florida counties: Orange, Seminole, Osceola, Polk, Volusia, Flagler and…
Special Bulletin
Public
The recent resurgence of COVID-19 has many states near or at bed and intensive care unit (ICU) capacity, and health care facilities’ ability to meet surgical…
Special Bulletin
Public
  Sign In to Download the Special Bulletin: HHS Announces Expanded Eligibility for General Distribution Funds   The Department of Health and Human…
Other Resources
As the city of Wilmington, Delaware, began reopening in June, ChristianaCare helped local business owners do so safely. The health system developed a…
Other Resources
Caregivers at INTEGRIS Health, based in Oklahoma City, are featured in its new social media campaign, wearing face masks and sharing why it’s important…