AHA on July 21 submitted comments on how Congress can ensure that the 340B program continues to benefit patients and communities, while acting to prevent any cuts to the program that would jeopardize patient access to care. Responding to a bipartisan request by senators for input, AHA strongly urged that the Health Resources and Services Administration finalize its Administrative Dispute Resolution rule for the 340B program and explicitly state that the ADR process is an available forum for affected 340B hospitals to seek redress from restrictions targeted to community and specialty pharmacies. AHA also recommended that Congress require HRSA to increase its annual audits of drug companies in the 340B program, which average six per year compared with over 200 per year for 340B covered entities, and give hospitals and other covered entities the ability to audit drug manufacturers.

Related News Articles

Headline
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee June 30 denied a motion for a preliminary injunction by AbbVie in its lawsuit against the state’s…
Headline
The AHA June 27 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee that defends the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law…
Chairperson's File
Public
Advocacy is a core part of the work of the AHA, protecting and sustaining what hospitals and health systems need to truly care for our communities. We often…
Headline
A U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge June 27 ruled against Johnson & Johnson and sided with the Department of Health and Human Services…
Headline
The AHA June 16 released a report showing hospitals that participated in the 340B Drug Pricing Program are not only subject to disproportionately greater…
Chairperson's File
Public
Advocacy is such an important part of what we do as hospitals and health systems — and what the AHA does on behalf of our field — to help ensure that we get…