Last week, a series of emails that became public revealed communication between executives at UnitedHealth Group and researchers studying the frequency of surprise medical billing. The emails demonstrate the two entities coordinated extensively on research analysis and narrative while also hiding the insurer’s role. 

While reliable research and analysis is an essential part of the policymaking process, “these emails are a reminder that United has the ability to stack the deck to benefit themselves at the expense of their customers, providers and policymakers and have the means to do so because they control so much data,” according to an AHA Stat blog published today. “Certainly, United deserves more scrutiny for this behavior – not the least of which should be pervasive skepticism of the research they tout to achieve their policy objectives and criticize the objectives of others.”

Read the full AHA blog here
 

Related News Articles

Headline
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released a notice Oct. 28 clarifying that the Fair Credit Reporting Act preempts state laws on credit reporting,…
Headline
The AHA provided a statement for a Senate Special Committee on Aging hearing today on shoppable services that improve health outcomes and lower costs. The AHA…
Headline
An AHA-authored essay published by Health Affairs today analyzes why a hospital price cap simulator tool, created by Brown University’s Center for Advancing…
Headline
The AHA yesterday responded to a request for information from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on price transparency policy, specifically the…
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas July 11 vacated a rule issued by the previous administration that would have banned medical bills…
Headline
The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury May 22 released several new guidance documents and requests for information on price…