Site-neutral Payment Proposals Threaten Access to Care

Americans rely heavily on hospitals to provide 24/7 access to care for all types of patients, to serve as a safety net provider for vulnerable populations, and to have the resources needed to respond to disasters. These roles are not explicitly funded; instead they are built into a hospital’s overall cost structure and supported by revenues received from providing direct patient care. Hospitals are also subject to more comprehensive licensing, accreditation and regulatory requirements than other settings.

Yet some policymakers want to make total payment for a service provided in a hospital the same as when a service is provided in a physician office or ambulatory surgery center (ASC).

Lawmakers are considering three site-neutral payment changes that would result in lower payments to hospitals.

  • Paying hospitals for evaluation and management (E/M) services in the hospital outpatient department (HOPD) setting at the physician fee schedule (PFS) amount
  • Paying hospitals for 66 specified ambulatory payment classifications (APCs) at the PFS amount
  • Capping hospital payments for 12 proposed APCs at the ASC rate

According to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Medicare margins are already negative 12.4 percent for outpatient services.

Implementing these policies would further erode HOPDs’ Medicare margins, threatening access to care.

Related Resources

Advisory
Member
On Nov.
Press Releases
Action Alert
Member
Reps. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.), chair of the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, and Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) are asking their House colleagues to sign on to a…
Action Alert
Member
October 2, 2018—Reps.
Press Releases
Letter
Public
The AHA is deeply disappointed in certain proposals that CMS has chosen to set forth in this proposed rule for the CY 2019 outpatient prospective payment…