Care Comparison Reports

September 2018 - The findings of this new study, conducted for the American Hospital Association by KNG Health Consulting LLC, highlight why site-neutral payment proposals under consideration by Congress to reimburse hospitals the same amount as physician offices could threaten access to care for the most vulnerable patients and communities.


Medicare patients who receive care in a hospital outpatient department (HOPD) are more likely to be poorer and have more severe chronic conditions than Medicare patients treated in an independent physician office (IPO). This study also specifically examined the characteristics of Medicare cancer patients seen in HOPDs and IPOs and found similar results.

Related Resources

Letter/Comment
Public
AHA letter to Representative Kilmer expressing support of H.R. 2552, the “Protecting Local Access to Care for Everyone Act.” 
Legal Documents
Introduction Plaintiffs’ opening brief explained the clear limits that Congress imposed on the ability of the Centers for Medicare & Medi
Guides/Reports
Public
This study examines how Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries receiving surgical care in HOPDs compare to those receiving care in ASCs.
Legal Documents
MINUTE ORDER resetting the briefing schedule after consideration of the parties' response to the Court's February 27, 2019 Minute Order.
Legal Documents
The parties to the above-referenced related actions respectfully submit this response to this Court’s minute order of February 27, 2019, which directed the…
Issue Brief