Care Comparison Reports

September 2018 - The findings of this new study, conducted for the American Hospital Association by KNG Health Consulting LLC, highlight why site-neutral payment proposals under consideration by Congress to reimburse hospitals the same amount as physician offices could threaten access to care for the most vulnerable patients and communities.


Medicare patients who receive care in a hospital outpatient department (HOPD) are more likely to be poorer and have more severe chronic conditions than Medicare patients treated in an independent physician office (IPO). This study also specifically examined the characteristics of Medicare cancer patients seen in HOPDs and IPOs and found similar results.

Related Resources

Action Alert
Member Non-Fed
As Congress enters the home stretch for 2019, they are considering a number of key hospital and health system issues as part of year-end legislation. These…
Advisory
Member
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Nov. 1 released the calendar year (CY) 2020 outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS)/ambulatory…
Special Bulletin
Member
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Nov. 1 released the calendar year 2020 outpatient prospective payment system/ambulatory surgical center…
Action Alert
Member
Members of Congress are in their home districts and states for the next two weeks, and it is an excellent opportunity to talk with your lawmakers about…
Letter/Comment
Public
The AHA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ hospital outpatient prospective payment system and…
Special Bulletin
Member
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) July 29 released the calendar year (CY) 2020 outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS)/ambulatory…